<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Digital Forum: Day 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/national-digital-forum-day-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/national-digital-forum-day-1/</link>
	<description>Multitouch Exhibit Design and Interactive Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:17:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Spadaccini</title>
		<link>http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/national-digital-forum-day-1/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Spadaccini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/30/national-digital-forum-day-1/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Phil,
Thanks for the comments, you bring up some excellent points. I think there is an interesting parallel between the first age of static displays and Web 1.0. One could argue that the participatory sites of Web 2.0 mirror the development of interactive exhibits that we saw in late 1960s and 70s.

As for how we view the Web 1.0 sites &quot;that have grown, flourished and died without (a) trace.&quot;  In my course at UVIC we looked at some early and influential Web sites and found a few of them unviewable due to outdated technology (strange plug ins, weird javascript, etc.)--so it is already happening!

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,<br />
Thanks for the comments, you bring up some excellent points. I think there is an interesting parallel between the first age of static displays and Web 1.0. One could argue that the participatory sites of Web 2.0 mirror the development of interactive exhibits that we saw in late 1960s and 70s.</p>
<p>As for how we view the Web 1.0 sites &#8220;that have grown, flourished and died without (a) trace.&#8221;  In my course at UVIC we looked at some early and influential Web sites and found a few of them unviewable due to outdated technology (strange plug ins, weird javascript, etc.)&#8211;so it is already happening!</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilC</title>
		<link>http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/national-digital-forum-day-1/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/30/national-digital-forum-day-1/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>&#039;as a first time attendee at this local event (at Te Papa) I was extremely impressed by the whole thing - the organisation, the presentations and the content.
It strikes me that this web 2.0 stuff is the third age of museums.
I would define the first age as static displays, the second age as mechanical display inter-action and the third age as virtual inter-action.
And what a serendipitous (?sp) time it could prove to be as the public mold the facilities to their own understanding and thinking - whether it be name tags for the MMA or tile designs for the V&amp;A.
The unanswered question, however - what&#039;s to become of all this virtual information? Is there going to be a blank in history from 1995 - 2010 of all the websites that have grown, flourished and died without trace?
regards
Phil Caton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;as a first time attendee at this local event (at Te Papa) I was extremely impressed by the whole thing &#8211; the organisation, the presentations and the content.<br />
It strikes me that this web 2.0 stuff is the third age of museums.<br />
I would define the first age as static displays, the second age as mechanical display inter-action and the third age as virtual inter-action.<br />
And what a serendipitous (?sp) time it could prove to be as the public mold the facilities to their own understanding and thinking &#8211; whether it be name tags for the MMA or tile designs for the V&amp;A.<br />
The unanswered question, however &#8211; what&#8217;s to become of all this virtual information? Is there going to be a blank in history from 1995 &#8211; 2010 of all the websites that have grown, flourished and died without trace?<br />
regards<br />
Phil Caton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/national-digital-forum-day-1/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/30/national-digital-forum-day-1/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Hey it&#039;s a shame you couldn&#039;t have stayed to watch some cricket...

See you in April in SF at MW2007!?!

Enjoy your time in Wellington. It&#039;s a beautiful city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey it&#8217;s a shame you couldn&#8217;t have stayed to watch some cricket&#8230;</p>
<p>See you in April in SF at MW2007!?!</p>
<p>Enjoy your time in Wellington. It&#8217;s a beautiful city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Spadaccini</title>
		<link>http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/national-digital-forum-day-1/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Spadaccini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/30/national-digital-forum-day-1/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Thanks Geoff. The speech went well. I will probably blog on some of the topics when I get back . I actually was closer than you think, I made an unscheduled stop in Sydney (for a couple hours) when I missed a flight in San Francisco.

I agree, the galleries are fantastic at Te Papa. I had bit more time today to check things out. I can see why its one of your favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Geoff. The speech went well. I will probably blog on some of the topics when I get back . I actually was closer than you think, I made an unscheduled stop in Sydney (for a couple hours) when I missed a flight in San Francisco.</p>
<p>I agree, the galleries are fantastic at Te Papa. I had bit more time today to check things out. I can see why its one of your favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoffcrane</title>
		<link>http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/national-digital-forum-day-1/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>geoffcrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideum.com/blog/2006/11/30/national-digital-forum-day-1/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>G&#039;day Jim,

Welcome back to the southern hemisphere!

Te Papa is one of my favourite museums - Helen and I have been lucky enough to have visited there twice, in 2001 and 2004. The galleries are beautifully presented and the range of exhibits and artifacts impressvie.

I hope the keynote went well.

Geoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day Jim,</p>
<p>Welcome back to the southern hemisphere!</p>
<p>Te Papa is one of my favourite museums &#8211; Helen and I have been lucky enough to have visited there twice, in 2001 and 2004. The galleries are beautifully presented and the range of exhibits and artifacts impressvie.</p>
<p>I hope the keynote went well.</p>
<p>Geoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

